part 4 jesus

Here is this week’s assignment. You are only adding one paragraph. This one will include a peer review.
The Module Four assignment is complete/incomplete (25 points). You will be taking three steps: (1) revise and refine what you already have; (2) add a section from Module Four that includes one paragraph of a close analysis of a passage from Matthew that supports your thesis; (3) a peer review. Steps (1) and (2) are due Sunday night or into the weekend. Step (3) is due next Thursday. Peer reviewers will be assigned early Monday morning. Each step is laid out in more detail below:
(1) Revise and refine. Take another look at your introduction, thesis, and your first section on Mark.
Does your thesis concretely sum up what you are arguing or asserting in your paper thus far? Have your thoughts changed? Note: this is a longer paper. Your thesis need not be limited to a couple sentences.
Do your Mark and Matthew sections connect well with your thesis?
(2) Compose another paragraph in your Matthew section that analyzes one passage from Matthew in light of your thesis. Some of you may have already done this. If you have, revise and refine based on what we learned about examples of close readings this week and redaction criticism.
I want you to be able to use the citation guide of your own discipline. But I do want you to cite the texts. If you are a THRS major, use this guide (Links to an external site.) (based on Chicago Style). Or if you simply want to use the citation guide of biblical studies, feel free to use this link as well. If you want to see what a professional paper looks like in this discipline’s format, here is an example of the formatting Download an example of the formatting.
(3) After you submit your paper Sunday night, you will be assigned a partner to review your work. You will also be given someone else’s writing to review. The reviews will be anonymous.

Religion Question

Here is this week’s assignment. You are only adding one paragraph. This one will include a peer review.
The Module Four assignment is complete/incomplete (25 points). You will be taking three steps: (1) revise and refine what you already have; (2) add a section from Module Four that includes one paragraph of a close analysis of a passage from Matthew that supports your thesis; (3) a peer review. Steps (1) and (2) are due Sunday night or into the weekend. Step (3) is due next Thursday. Peer reviewers will be assigned early Monday morning. Each step is laid out in more detail below:
(1) Revise and refine. Take another look at your introduction, thesis, and your first section on Mark.
Does your thesis concretely sum up what you are arguing or asserting in your paper thus far? Have your thoughts changed? Note: this is a longer paper. Your thesis need not be limited to a couple sentences.
Do your Mark and Matthew sections connect well with your thesis?
(2) Compose another paragraph in your Matthew section that analyzes one passage from Matthew in light of your thesis. Some of you may have already done this. If you have, revise and refine based on what we learned about examples of close readings this week and redaction criticism.
I want you to be able to use the citation guide of your own discipline. But I do want you to cite the texts. If you are a THRS major, use this guide (Links to an external site.) (based on Chicago Style). Or if you simply want to use the citation guide of biblical studies, feel free to use this link as well. If you want to see what a professional paper looks like in this discipline’s format, here is an example of the formatting Download an example of the formatting.
(3) After you submit your paper Sunday night, you will be assigned a partner to review your work. You will also be given someone else’s writing to review. The reviews will be anonymous.
Read instructions about how to submit a peer review (Links to an external site.) and where you can find your peer’s feedback (Links to an external site.).
This peer review assignment is quite simple. I want you to answer three sets of questions about the writing. You will be able to add your comments to the right of the paper. These comments are informal and are part of the complete/incomplete grade.
Does the thesis concretely sum up what your colleague is arguing or asserting thus far? Do you have any questions about the thesis that may help your colleague dig deeper?
Do the two sections in the paper thus far connect well to the thesis? How do they add insight to the thesis? Do you have any suggestions of further connections?
What one new thing have you learned by reading this writing?
one paragraph don’t worry about peer review

Literature Evaluation Table CHOSEN ISSUE/BARRIER HEALTH PROFESSIONAL SHORTAGE

Identify a barrier or issue in health care that you want to address through your capstone project paper. Perform a literature review on the barrier or issue using the GCU Library.https://library.gcu.edu/
Present 8-10 peer-reviewed primary research articles. These articles should be either qualitative or quantitative.
You may use either health care or nursing peer-reviewed journals; however, at least half of the primary articles must come from peer-reviewed nursing journals. The peer-reviewed articles must consist of research published within the last 5 years.
Use the “HLT-494 – Literature Evaluation Table” template to document your detailed assessment of each primary study. This document helps break down the components of each article to ensure the article meets the requirements for a professional nursing paper. Ensure that each of your articles provides information that meets each criterion listed. Assess the research and provide a detailed and clear explanation of how each article supports your capstone project and evidence-based practice (between five and six sentences).

Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue

Write a 4-6 page analysis of a current problem or issue in health care, including a proposed solution and possible ethical implications.Introduction
In your health care career, you will be confronted with many problems that demand a solution. By using research skills, you can learn what others are doing and saying about similar problems. Then, you can analyze the problem and the people and systems it affects. You can also examine potential solutions and their ramifications. This assessment allows you to practice this approach with a real-world problem.Instructions
Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.Describe the health care problem or issue you selected for use in Assessment 2 (from the Assessment Topic Areas media piece) and provide details about it. Explore your chosen topic. For this, you should use the first four steps of the Socratic Problem-Solving Approach to aid your critical thinking. This approach was introduced in Assessment 2.
Identify possible causes for the problem or issue.

Use scholarly information to describe and explain the health care problem or issue and identify possible causes for it. Identify at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles about the topic. You may find the How Do I Find Peer-Reviewed Articles? library guide helpful in locating appropriate references.
You may use articles you found while working on Assessment 2 or you may search the Capella library for other articles.
You may find the applicable Undergraduate Library Research Guide helpful in your search.

Review the Think Critically About Source Quality to help you complete the following: Assess the credibility of the information sources.
Assess the relevance of the information sources.

Analyze the health care problem or issue. Describe the setting or context for the problem or issue.
Describe why the problem or issue is important to you.
Identify groups of people affected by the problem or issue.
Provide examples that support your analysis of the problem or issue.

Discuss potential solutions for the health care problem or issue. Describe what would be required to implement a solution.
Describe potential consequences of ignoring the problem or issue.
Provide the pros and cons for one of the solutions you are proposing.

Explain the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if potential solution was implemented. Describe what would be necessary to implement the proposed solution.
Explain the ethical principles that need to be considered (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if the potential solution was implemented.
Provide examples from the literature to support the points you are making.

Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:Assessment 3 Example [PDF].
Additional Requirements
Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:Length: 4–6 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
APA tutorial: Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] for guidance.
Written communication: Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
Using outside sources: Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style.
References: Integrate information from outside sources to include at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles and three in-text citations within the paper.
APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citations of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page.
Organize your paper using the following structure and headings:Title page. A separate page.
Introduction. A brief one-paragraph statement about the purpose of the paper.
Elements of the problem/issue. Identify the elements of the problem or issue or question.
Analysis. Analyze, define, and frame the problem or issue.
Considering options. Consider solutions, responses, or answers.
Solution. Choose a solution, response, or answer.
Ethical implications. Ethical implications of implementing the solution.
Implementation. Implementation of the potential solution.
Conclusion. One paragraph.
Competencies Measured:
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:Competency 1: Apply information literacy and library research skills to obtain scholarly information in the field of health care. Use scholarly information to describe and explain a health care problem or issue and identify possible causes for it.

Competency 2: Apply scholarly information through critical thinking to solve problems in the field of health care. Analyze a health care problem or issue by describing the context, explaining why it is important and identifying populations affected by it.
Discuss potential solutions for a health care problem or issue and describe what would be required to implement a solution.

Competency 3: Apply ethical principles and academic standards to the study of health care. Explain the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if potential solution was implemented

Competency 4: Write for a specific audience, in appropriate tone and style, in accordance with Capella’s writing standards. Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
Write following APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references.

SCORING GUIDEUse the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.VIEW SCORING GUIDE

IntroductionSelecting a topic for your written assessments can be challenging, but it’s important to make a thoughtful choice.Choose a topic area of interest to you from the topic suggestions in this media piece. You will use this topic to complete Assessments 2 and 3. Be sure to select a topic that will be manageable for a written assessment.To explore the chosen topic, you should use the Socratic Problem-Solving Approach, focusing on the sections specifically called out in the assessment guidelines.

Topic 1:Limited Access to HealthcareShort Description:
Consumers face barriers to healthcare access for assorted reasons. For example: due to geographic location, provider availability, transportation issues and mobility.Potential Intervention Approaches:
– Healthcare information online
– Telemedicine
– In–home healthcare services
Keywords for Articles:
online health information seeking, health care access, health information systems, consumer health information, chronic disease, health information search, health seeking behavior, rural nursingReferences:
Bhandari, N. (2014). Seeking health information online: does limited healthcare access matter? Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA (1067-5027), 21 (6), p. 1113. https://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.library.capella.edu/pmc/articles/PMC4215038/Lee, K., Hoti, K., Hughes, J. D.,

Health

Create a 3-5 page annotated bibliography and summary based on your research related to best practices addressing one of the health care problems or issues in the Assessment Topic Areas media piece faced by a health care organization that is of interest to you.Introduction
In your professional life, you will need to find credible evidence to support your decisions and your plans of action. You will want to keep abreast of best practices to help your organization adapt to the ever-changing health care environment. Being adept at research will help you find the information you need. For this assessment, you will review the Assessment Topic Areas media piece and select one of the health care problems or issues to research, which will be a current health care problem or issue faced by a health care organization that is of interest to you.Instructions
Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.For this assessment, research best practices related to a current health care problem. Your selected problem or issue will be utilized again in Assessment 3. To explore your chosen topic, you should use the first two steps of the Socratic Problem-Solving Approach to aid your critical thinking.View the Assessment Topic Areas media piece and select one of the health care problems or issues in the media piece to research. Write a brief overview of the selected topic. In your overview: Summarize the health care problem or issue.
Describe your interest in the topic.
Describe any professional experience you have with this topic.

Identify peer-reviewed articles relevant to health care issue or problem. Conduct a search for scholarly or academic peer-reviewed literature related to the topic and describe the criteria you used to search for articles, including the names of the databases you used. You will select four current scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles published during the past 3–5 years that relate to your topic. Refer to the NHS-FPX4000: Developing a Health Care Perspective Library Guide to help you locate appropriate references.

Use keywords related to the health care problem or issue you are researching to select relevant articles.

Assess the credibility and explain relevance of the information sources you find. Determine if the source is from an academic peer-reviewed journal.
Determine if the publication is current.
Determine if information in the academic peer-reviewed journal article is still relevant.

Analyze academic peer-reviewed journal articles using the annotated bibliography organizational format. Provide rationale for inclusion of each selected article. The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to document a list of references along with key information about each one. The detail about the reference is the annotation. Developing this annotated bibliography will create a foundation of knowledge about the selected topic. In your annotated bibliography: Identify the purpose of the article.
Summarize the information.
Provide rationale for inclusion of each article.
Include the conclusions and findings of the article.
Write your annotated bibliography in a paragraph form. The annotated bibliography should be approximately 150 words (1–3 paragraphs) in length.
List the full reference for the source in APA format (author, date, title, publisher, et cetera) and use APA format for the annotated bibliography.
Make sure the references are listed in alphabetical order, are double-spaced, and use hanging indents.

Summarize what you have learned from developing an annotated bibliography. Summarize what you learned from your research in a separate paragraph or two at the end of the paper.
List the main points you learned from your research.
Summarize the main contributions of the sources you chose and how they enhanced your knowledge about the topic.

Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:Assessment 2 Example [PDF].
Additional Requirements
Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:Length: 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
APA tutorial: Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] for guidance.
Written communication: Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
Content: Provide a title page and reference page following APA style.
References: Use at least four scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles.
APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citation of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:Competency 1: Apply information literacy and library research skills to obtain scholarly information in the field of health care. Identify academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to a health care problem or issue and describe the criteria used for the literature search.

Competency 2: Apply scholarly information through critical thinking to solve problems in the field of health care. Assess the credibility and relevance of information sources.
Analyze academic peer-reviewed journal articles using the annotated bibliography organizational format.
Summarize what was learned from developing an annotated bibliography.

Competency 4: Write for a specific audience, in appropriate tone and style, in accordance with Capella’s writing standards. Summarize a health care problem or issue and describe a personal interest in it and experience with it.
Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
Write following APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references.

SCORING GUIDEUse the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.VIEW SCORING GUIDE

LINKS :

Socratic Problem-Solving ApproachThe Socratic Method is a teaching style in which teachers ask students questions designed to stimulate more complete thinking and deeper insight. It also relates to the steps of performing scientific research. When the Socratic approach is applied, students are prompted to look more closely at your ideas, question your assumptions and accepted premises, and view your choices through a rigorous lens.Apply the Socratic approach
Applying the Socratic approach to problem solving helps you identify gaps and improve your thinking when writing papers or completing projects. The questions may be used to spark new insights when responding to discussion topics and posts.Identify the elements of the problem, issue, or question
Analyze, define, and frame the problem, issue, or question
Consider solutions, responses, or answers
Choose a solution, response, or answer
Implement your choice
Evaluate the results
Socratic problem-solving references
Paul, R.,

Health Economics

WEEK 10 ASSIGNMENT – CURRENT AND FUTURE ECONOMIC ISSUES IMPACTING THE HEALTH CARE SECTOR
Week 10 Assignment – Current and Future Economic Issues Impacting the Health Care Sector
Overview
In this assignment you will select and research what you believe to be the most important and pressing economic issue that confronts the United States in the health care industry today, and potential ways in which to mitigate the issue. Consider the economic effects of the issue on the health care industry, strategies to address the issue, and best practices for implementing the strategies. You will write a paper to formulate strategies and the application of best practices from other countries based on your research to address a selected economic issue confronting the U.S. health care industry.
Instructions
Provide a review of the selected issue in a 4–5 page paper in which you:
Develop a detailed description of the selected issue and the research process conducted.
Analyze the most significant economic effects of the researched issue on the health care industry supported with least two examples of the economic effects.
Formulate specific strategies that relevant entities/stakeholders may use to address the selected issue from an economic perspective supported with a rationale for the strategy.
Develop a strategic manner in which the United States can apply economic best practices from other countries to support the strategies for addressing the issue.
Critique the likelihood of the government and the private sector to effectively address the issue.
Use at least three sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment. For help with research, writing, and citation, access the library or review library guides.
This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course.
The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:
Formulate strategies for applying economic best practices from other countries to address economic issues confronting the U.S. health care industry.

**** see attached file for clearer instructions***** **********Research Question What is the meaning of DHS being designated by the

**** see attached file for clearer instructions*****
**********Research Question
What is the meaning of DHS being designated by the President as the lead federal agency to respond to Russia-related impacts on the United States related to the current Russia-Ukraine crisis?*******************

Forum Activity: Please present an outline of your Methodology section for your research project.

One important component of your reach paper is your Methodology section, which comes right after your Introduction and right before the body of your paper. This allows you to tell the reader how you are going to conduct the investigation you just introduced to them before presenting the results of your research in the body of your paper.

We are using this week’s forum as an opportunity for you to practice writing your methodology and share it with your peers to get some feedback on it.

a

A legitimate Methodology section should address the five specific areas – Statement of Purpose; Research Approach; Variables; Measurements, and Hypothesis, and it should be one paragraph in length.

Please use the following format for this post:

Statement of purpose and specific research question being addressed: For example: The purpose of this research is to investigate the topic of…to answer the following Research Question:…

Research Approach – type of research approach and data being used: identify and explain

Variables – identified (DV and IVs) and defined (as necessary): identify and explain

Measurements – how will you measure each of your IVs: identify and explain

What You Expect to find: your hypothesis

Provide at least one reference that you used to develop your Methodology (it can be to the assigned reading and/or the lesson material).

In your two peer responses, please let each of your peers know if you can follow the logic of their methodology.

For example: I understand your Statement of Purpose, Research Approach, and Variables, but I don’t quite understand how you intend to measure your IVs. Also, I am not quite sure how your hypothesis provides a direct answer to your RQ.

It is also okay to let your peer know that you can follow the logic of their methodology quite easily, which is also quite valuable feedback. For example: I understand how your Statement of Purpose, Research Approach, Variables, and Hypothesis are connected and relate to one another.

Your feedback will let your peers know how effective and logical their proposed methodology is to outsiders. Your critique should be substantive in nature and designed to improve your classmates’ methodology and help them refine in further.

Instructions: Fully utilize the materials that have been provided to you in order to support your response.

Your initial post must address each aspect of the format I have provided (there is no required word count), and to earn more points should include at least one direct reference to the assigned reading and a complete citation for it at the bottom of your post.
Please respond to at least two other students. Peer responses must be of sufficient length to provide feedback that is substantive (i.e., more than simply “Great job!”) and constructive (i.e., specific, relevant, and intended to help improve) (around 100 words is a good guide). The goal is to provide your peers with feedback that is specific and helpful.
Feel free to provide a response to my query, but it is not required for you to do so. You will, however, earn more points for responding to my query.

Forum posts are graded on timeliness, relevance, knowledge of the weekly readings, and the quality of original ideas. While proper APA is not required, attribution to sources that informed your posting should be included. Refer to the grading rubric for additional details concerning grading criteria.

Evaluation of current Free eLearning platform featuring mechanical ventilation Systematic Literature Review

E-learning platforms, especially FOAM (Free Open-Access Medicine), are gaining attention in academia, business, and especially in the health care sectors. Leading crises, for example, the pandemic, highlight the tremendous importance of the appropriate development of e-learning systems. Conduct a Lit review and analyse the FOMAS on the current Market. Attached is the Gap Analysis already and the Paper which is started already.

Use if possible the Metriq provided by the UC Davis paper to score contains seven quality- related scales, each on a scale of 0 to 3, for a maximal score of 21. To indicate the quality of the current Foam containing Breath on the Market

Value in Healthcare Essay

A student should focus on the subject matter from the text that interested them the most, then develop a PowerPoint presentation that will be due during the final week of the class.
The first slide should be your Introduction slide, the next 10-15 slides should be informational slides, the last slide should be the reference slide (the URLs of the pictures or information for citing or referencing your work).

I have attached what the paper topic should be researched

Office of the Inspector General

Go to http://oig.hhs.govLinks to an external site.. Click Newsroom > Videos. Locate and watch videos on fraud and abuse. Be sure to note the title of the videos you watch. On that same website, locate and watch videos on the work of the Inspector General’s Office. Be sure to note the title of the videos you watch.

What was significant about the fraud and abuse issue(s) you learned about?
What attempts were made, or could be made, to stop the fraud or abuse?
What was the role of the Office of the Inspector General in addressing fraud or abuse in the case(s) you watched?
This assignment should be a 2-3 page paper with appropriate APA format. There is a sample attached to this weeks announcement that will help with formatting if needed.